Sub-Classification Within Reserved Classes SC/STs Is Permissible, Observes Supreme Court
The seven-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, said sub-classification is permissible to grant separate quotas for more backwards within the SC/ST categories.
New Delhi: The Supreme Courtroom on Thursday pointed out sub-classification within the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes is permissible. The pinnacle courtroom located that states are empowered to make this classification for granting quota in jobs and admissions. In a predominant enchancment, the pinnacle courtroom — by 6:1 majority — set apart its personal 2004 judgment within the Chinnaiah case that ruled in opposition to sub-classification of scheduled castes (SC).
The seven-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, pointed out sub-classification is permissible to give separate quotas for extra backwards within the SC/ST various varieties.
CJI DY Chandrachud says there are 6 opinions. Justice Bela Trivedi has dissented and the CJI pointed out majority of us have overruled EV Chinnaiah and we guard sub classification is permitted.
As an substitute, this SC verdict overrules the 2004 judgment of a five-judge Constitution bench within the case of EV Chinnaiah vs Kingdom of Andhra Pradesh.
Justice Bela M Trivedi, in a dissenting judgement, pointed out that she disagrees with the bulk judgement and delivered that in absence of executive of legislative potential the states do now now not have any competence to sub classify the castes and sub-classify the reward reserved for all of Schedule Caste.
Justice Trivedi pointed out sub-classification by states would amount to tinkering with the Presidential notification under Article 341(2).
What's Your Reaction?
