‘Whether it is temple or dargah…’: Supreme Court reserves order on framing guidelines of ‘bulldozer justice’
However, the apex court clarified that the order will not be applicable to unauthorised structure in any public place like - roads, streets, footpaths, abutting railway lines or any water bodies.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on October 1, said that it'll soon lay down guidelines for all citizens on the issue of demolition of properties and reserved its verdict on pleas that alleged the properties of being demolished in a substantial collection of states including those accused of crime. Observing that its directions will likely be applicable all across america of a, the SC said it is going to make it clear that merely because an individual is an accused and even a convict, it is able to’t be a ground for demolition of property.
“Whatever we are laying down, we are a secular us of a. We're laying it down for all of the citizens, for all of the institutions no longer for any particular community,” a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said.
Observing that there can’t be a distinct law for a particular religion, the bench said it'll no longer protect any unauthorised constructions on public roads, government lands or forests. “We're ready to take care to be sure our order does no longer help the encroachers on any of the public places,” the bench said.
“Close for orders,” the bench said after the hearing within the matter concluded.
After the bench said it changed into reserving its verdict within the matter, some of essentially the most advocates appearing for the petitioners referred to the apex court’s order of September 17 which had said there will likely be no demolition of properties, including of those accused of crime, till October 1 without its permission. The lawyer urged the bench to extend its intervening time order.
“It is there till we come to a decision this matter,” the bench said.
Earlier the court had observed that even one instance of illegal demolition changed into against the “ethos” of the Constitution. The apex court had clarified that its order would no longer be applicable if there changed into an unauthorised structure in any public place equivalent to roads, streets, footpaths, abutting railway lines or any water bodies and likewise to cases where there changed into an order for demolition made by a court of law.
What's Your Reaction?
