Two cities stopped adding fluoride to water. Science reveals what happened
As calls to end fluoride in water get louder, changes to the dental health of children in Calgary, Canada, and Juneau, Alaska, may provide a cautionary tale.

Warren Loeppky has been a pediatric dentist within the Canadian city of Calgary for two decades. Over the best decade, he says, tooth decay in children he’s considered has become extra general, extra aggressive and extra severe. Many of his younger patients agree with so great injury that he has to work with them beneath same old anesthesia.
“It’s always unhappy seeing a younger dinky one in effort,” Loeppky says. “Dental decay is very preventable. It breaks your coronary heart to stare these younger kids that aren’t in a pickle to like.”
Loeppky notes that many factors can contribute to tooth decay in children, including their eating regimen and genetics. Gentle, he believes a part of the disaster is linked to a resolution made within the halls of native authorities: In 2011, Calgary stopped adding fluoride to its ingesting water.
“This resolution of city councilors used to be surprising to the same old public, but exquisite and alarming to dentists, to pediatricians, to anesthesiologists and others within the successfully being care field, who knew what it would mean,” says Juliet Guichon, a lawful and ethics scholar at the College of Calgary who formed a community that advocated for adding fluoride relief to ingesting water within the town.
Several stories agree with confirmed that fluoride is a precise and effective choice to discontinuance tooth decay. It recruits assorted minerals, corresponding to calcium and phosphate, to present a boost to tooth enamel and fend off acid made by micro organism. Oral successfully being can also affect a person’s overall successfully being.
The U.S. Facilities for Disease Management and Prevention recommends that communities across the country add 0.7 milligrams of fluoride for every liter of water. It’s up to declare and native governments to deem if they should apply that advice. In 2022, the CDC reported that 63 p.c of American citizens got fluoridated water.
But that put collectively now may presumably be coming beneath new scrutiny. In March, Utah turned the first declare to ban fluoridation; many native governments across the country are also debating the anguish. And on April 7, Division of Smartly being and Human Companies and products Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told news reporters that he deliberate to say the CDC to discontinuance its advice.
Adding fluoride to water has been contested within the United States for the explanation that put collectively turned widespread within the mid-Twentieth century. Opponents agree with traditionally voiced successfully being concerns, including about tooth staining and disproven worries that fluoridated water may motive bone most cancers, as successfully as claims that fluoridation amounts to mass drugs and violates person freedoms. More now not too long within the past, of us agree with pointed to analyze showing an affiliation between fluoride and decreased IQ in children. But these findings, which were closely criticized, checked out fluoride concentrations great better than these say in most American citizens’ ingesting water.
What took declare in Calgary, as successfully as in Juneau, Alaska, which stopped water fluoridation in 2007, may very successfully be a cautionary memoir for assorted municipalities. Science Data spoke with researchers and various consultants in each and every cities to imprint what can happen when native governments opt to discontinuance adding fluoride to ingesting water.
Having a stare into the mouths of 2nd-graders in Calgary
Lindsay McLaren says she never anticipated turning right into a self-described fluoridation researcher. As a quantitative social scientist at the College of Calgary, she stories how public policies can affect the successfully being of a population. She hadn’t given great belief to fluoridation till 2011, when the Calgary Metropolis Council determined to get rid of fluoride from the town’s water.
The pass triggered McLaren to manufacture a behold having a stare at how the dental successfully being of the town’s children fared as soon as fluoride used to be removed. She recruited dental hygienists to head to colleges and peep the mouths of 2nd-grade college students. Some went to colleges in Calgary and others went to colleges in Edmonton, a an identical city within the same province that aloof fluoridated its water.
In Calgary, the team surveyed 2,649 2nd-graders around seven years after fluoridation ended, that blueprint they had most likely never been uncovered to fluoride of their ingesting water. Of these, 65 p.c had tooth decay. In Edmonton, 55 p.c of surveyed children had tooth decay. Whereas these percentages may seem shut, they value a statistically principal inequity that McLaren calls “moderately spacious” on the population stage.
“Compared to Edmonton kids, Calgary kids were now severely worse as some distance as dental successfully being goes,” McLaren says. Varied factors, including eating regimen and socioeconomic situation, did now not present the diversities between children in Edmonton and Calgary, she says.
In 2024, every other behold found a better payment of tooth decay-related therapies for which a dinky one used to be positioned beneath same old anesthesia in Calgary than in Edmonton. From 2018 to 2019, 32 out of every 10,000 children in Calgary were keep beneath same old anesthesia to treat tooth decay, in contrast with 17 for every 10,000 children in Edmonton.
The findings didn’t shock native dentists, says Bruce Yaholnitsky, a periodontist in Calgary. “That is candy apparent to us. But you'll agree with gotten to agree with upright science to expose, in some conditions, the apparent.”
Examining Medicaid claims in Juneau
Years before Calgary’s city council opted to get rid of fluoride from its water, individuals of the native authorities in Juneau made a an identical resolution.
Jennifer Meyer says she first turned inquisitive about finding out the effects of lack of fluoridation in Juneau after transferring there in 2015. At the time, she had two younger children; a third used to be born in Juneau. She used to be taken aback at how great dental work, including fillings, she seen amongst many diversified preschool and predominant college children.
“I belief ‘Wow, what’s going on here?’ Which potential that of I could stare moderately a pair of the decay and the repairs,” Meyer says.
Juneau had stopped adding fluoride to its ingesting water in 2007 after asking a six-member payment to review the evidence around fluoridation. A reproduction of the associated payment’s document obtained from Meyer, a public successfully being researcher at the College of Alaska Anchorage, reveals that two payment individuals adverse to fluoridation made claims about the successfully being effects that Meyer says are “fraudulent” and “now not grounded in quality investigations.”
The payment’s chair criticized anti-fluoride positions, at one level writing that a part of the literature used to be per “junk science.” But he within the slay urged that the town discontinuance fluoridation, claiming that the evidence about its security at low concentrations used to be inconclusive. With the associated payment’s individuals shatter up at 3–3, the Juneau Assembly voted to total fluoridation.
Meyer and her colleagues analyzed Medicaid dental claims recordsdata made before and after the town stopped fluoridation. They found that the frequent collection of procedures to treat tooth decay rose in children beneath age 6, from 1.5 therapies per dinky one in 2003 to 2.5 therapies per dinky one in 2012.
The value of these therapies in children beneath 6 years frail, when adjusted for inflation, jumped by an common of $303 bucks per dinky one from 2003 to 2012.
Meyer says that increased Medicaid prices for dental therapies within the slay prove being paid by taxpayers.
“When politicians deem to withhold a precise and effective public successfully being intervention take care of fluoridation, they're imposing a hidden successfully being care tax on everybody of their declare or neighborhood,” Meyer says.
Continued calls to total fluoridation
At the present time, many opponents to fluoride in water cite a controversial systematic review launched best year by the National Toxicology Program, which is nestled in HHS and evaluates the successfully being effects of substances. That August 2024 review concluded with “common confidence” that water with extra than 1.5 mg of fluoride per liter used to be related to decreased IQ in children.
But that dose is extra than double the CDC’s urged amount. And the review authors couldn’t resolve if low fluoride concentrations take care of these say in handled ingesting water within the United States had a detrimental attain on children’s IQ. As well, merely finding an affiliation does now not expose that better levels of fluoride caused decreased IQ, the NTP notes on its web space.
More broadly, Meyer says, “ending fluoridation … per aged or misrepresented evidence is now not a precaution, it’s negligence.”
Juneau stays without fluoridated water. In Calgary, even if, residents voted in 2021 to bring it relief. With 62 p.c of voters opting to reintroduce fluoride, the margin used to be better than it used to be within the 1989 vote that introduced fluoride to Calgary within the first declare. Guichon says McLaren’s behold, blended with “optimistic advocacy,” helped bring the voters to the polls.
“More of us voted to reinstate fluoride than voted for the mayor. So that’s a success,” Meyer says. “But in The US, we're coming into a darkish time.”
What's Your Reaction?






