What is ‘Riyasat-e-Madina? Pakistan army chief Asim Munir talking about this, Imran Khan also an advocate, its related to Prophet Muhammad due to…
The Riyasat-e-Madina or the State of Medina, was founded by Prophet Muhammed in 622 AD in Islam's holy city of Medina, and is seen by many Islamic scholars as the perfect model of an ideal Islamic society.

Pakistan is a highly-conservative and religion-pushed mutter, and its politicians and leaders maintain in total dilapidated Islam as a instrument to mobilize enhance and propagate their hold agenda. In a identical instance, Pakistan Navy Chief Normal Asim Munir lately talked about creating a “new Pakistan” alongside the lines of ‘Riyasat-e-Madina’, the main Islamic mutter established by Prophet Muhammad in Medina.
Pakistan should flee on Sahifa Madina
Speaking on the main In another country Pakistanis Convention on April 15 in Islamabad, the Navy chief asserted that Pakistan is the solely nation established on the premise of the Kalima, and must be flee in accordance to the guidelines laid down by the Prophet within the Sahifa Madina (the Constitution of Medina).
Critically, Pakistan’s jailed extinct High Minister Imran Khan will most likely be an advocate of ‘Riyasat-e-Madina’, and in 2022, had talked about setting up a brand new Pakistan per the the guidelines of the main Islamic mutter based by Prophet Muhammed in Medina at some point of the early years of Islam.
What is ‘Riyasat-e-Madina’?
The Riyasat-e-Madina or the Reveal of Medina, modified into once based by Prophet Muhammed in 622 AD in Islam’s holy metropolis of Medina, and is seen by many Islamic students as the ultimate mannequin of an overwhelming Islamic society, per the guidelines of solidarity, justice, and welfare of its voters. The mutter of Medina is flee below the guidelines laid down within the Sahifa of Medina or the Constitution of Medina, which is claimed to were drafted by the Prophet himself.
The Sahifa outlines the responsibilities and rights of voters belonging to various communities and religions, alongside side Muslims, Jews, and other ethnic and non secular groups, and seeks to united them below a total constitutional framework of governance, regulations, and social interplay.
Below Riyasat-e-Madina, definite inalienable rights and access to free and horny justice, is ensured to every citizen, with out reference to caste, creed, religion, or other distinctions, selling an environment of non secular harmony among Muslims, Jews, Christians and others, all of whom are free to practice their respective religions as per their hold scriptures and practices.
It also mandates a plan of responsibilities for voters, and entails an most necessary arrangement of charity, a form of tax, which would be dilapidated to tackle the unlucky and the needy. Moreover, the Sahifa Medina advocates a solid administrative and policing structure to set peace and justice within the mutter.
What critics articulate?
Whereas the Riyasat-e-Madina sounds a lot love a much less-refined model of any up-to-the-minute constitution, critics query its practicality in a contemporary, various, democratic, and rights-based society of the Twenty first century. They claim that whereas the mannequin may want been relevant for the seventh century Arabian society, it poses a likelihood to the liberties loved by girls folks, minorities, and other groups in a contemporary society.
Critics also argue that the theory that is walk to assemble hurdles in policy making and democratic debate, because its basically per non secular interpretations.
What's Your Reaction?






