Amitabh Bachchan was involved in BOFORS scandal? Senior journalist shares shocking details on his involvement, says BIG B….
The Bofors scam became a major political controversy, influencing the subsequent general elections, which Congress lost elections.
Amitabh Bachchan and Boforsgate: At the same time as you'll have heard about Bofors scandal and the title of Bollywood celeb Amitabh Bachchan linked to it, here's a horrid portray that will shock you. In a newly released book by weak journalist Chitra Subramaniam named Boforsgate: A Journalist’s Pursuit of Truth, the journalist has claimed that a portion of the then authorities and media attempted to implicate Bollywood celeb Amitabh Bachchan, who become a Congress MP from Allahabad on the time.
For these unversed, the Bofors scandal shook the Rajiv Gandhi authorities. It involved allegations of kickbacks in awarding a Swiss company the contract for 155mm discipline weapons. The rip-off become a fundamental political controversy, influencing the next same outdated elections, which Congress lost elections. Nonetheless, neither Rajiv Gandhi nor any member of his family or occasion has been came all over responsible so a ways.
Bollywood neatly-known particular person Amitabh Bachchan become sought to be implicated within the Bofors scandal by a planted sage linking his title to a secret Swiss fable for kickbacks from the Swedish palms huge as part of a “vicious campaign”, says journalist Chitra Subramaniam.
“No, there become fully no shred of proof that he (Amitabh Bachchan) had taken any cash. But the water had been muddied so noteworthy that by the time the water will most definitely be cleaned up, the wound had been performed,” Subramaniam urged IANS in an interview.
“And you respect how it is like, imagine the title of the Bachchans, I mean it’s a huge title…”
The sage broke out in two Swedish papers and then in a substitute of Indian papers, and Subramaniam acknowledged she become asked by numerous other folk how she had missed the sage however caught to her weapons of no longer doing it except she acquired unbiased affirmation and become sooner or later vindicated. Within the book, she moreover notes how the Bachchans got here to her home for dinner, and the talks sooner or later veered on to Bofors, and he or she urged him that she had no longer came all over any proof in opposition to him.
(With inputs from companies)
What's Your Reaction?
