Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, states on plea challenging 1995 Waqf Act

The apex court was hearing the petition challenging the 1995 Act.

May 27, 2025 - 17:30
 0  22
Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, states on plea challenging 1995 Waqf Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday issued idea to the Centre and snort governments on a plea not easy the Constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995, as amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

A bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih tagged the plea alongside with pending petitions not easy the 1995 Waqf Act.

The apex court became as soon as listening to the petition filed by one Nikhil Upadhyay not easy the 1995 Act.

All over the listening to, the bench requested recommend Ashwini Upadhyay, exhibiting for the petitioner, as to why he became as soon as not easy 1995 Act in 2025.

Upadhyay spoke back that he became as soon as also not easy 2013 Waqf Amendment Act. To this, CJI talked about, “Even then, 2013 to 2025. 12 years. There may be prolong.”

Supreme Court docket is already listening to petitions not easy the Locations of Address Act 1991 and the National Minority Charge Act 1992, recommend submitted.

Further Solicitor Routine Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Centre, urged the bench that the court has not allowed the obtain 22 situation to the 1995 Act to be heard alongside with the petitions not easy the 2025 Amendment. Nonetheless, there is just not this kind of thing as a objection to this contemporary petition being tagged alongside with the diversified petition not easy the 1995 Act.

The petition submitted that best Muslims have a law concerning to the administration of their charitable properties, and diversified religions attain not have a similar law; hence, the Waqf Act 1995 became as soon as discriminatory.

The petition challenged the constitutional validity of certain sections of the Waqf Act 1995 as amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, contending that these provisions are against Articles 14, 15, 21, 25, 26, and 27 of the Constitution.

The petitioner extra acknowledged that the snort can not grant, at the associated price of the public exchequer, the bills incurred for the verification of Waqfs and their properties, while there is just not this kind of thing as a similar boom nor a grant of bills for the idea of diversified spiritual establishments and their properties.

“The price of the idea for the verification of Waqf and its properties mustn't be borne by the snort. There should be a Routine or Uniform Guidelines for Non secular Trusts and Endowments,” the petition added.

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow