Supreme Court set to hear pleas against Waqf Act today, Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMPLB, Congress among petitioners

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions today, challenging the legality of the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. A special three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna along with Justices Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan, is expected to take up the matter around 2 PM. This law, which was […]

Apr 16, 2025 - 09:30
 0  9
Supreme Court set to hear pleas against Waqf Act today, Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMPLB, Congress among petitioners

The Supreme Court is determined to hear a series of petitions as we affirm, demanding the legality of the currently handed Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. A explicit three-desire bench, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna alongside with Justices Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan, is expected to take up the topic round 2 PM. This law, which became once cleared by Parliament in early April and signed by the President quickly after, has sparked critical political debate. The Congress get together, strongly opposing the Act, had announced its decision to method the Supreme Court, claiming that the amendments rush in opposition to the foundational values of the Structure and are intended to invent non secular division within the country.

The opposition to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 has drawn toughen from a wise resolution of political leaders and non secular figures. Key political voices backing the exclaim encompass Asaduddin Owaisi, lawmakers from the Congress and Trinamool Congress, alongside with representatives from a lot of assorted parties. Considerable non secular bodies treasure the All India Muslim Inside of most Law Board and Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind are additionally on the forefront of the good push in opposition to the law.

Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, who additionally serves as the get together’s whip within the Lok Sabha, filed one amongst the main petitions. He argues that the brand new provisions violate a lot of constitutional rights, in conjunction with the good to equality (Article 14), freedom of faith (Articles 25 and 26), security of cultural and tutorial rights for minorities (Article 29), and the good to property (Article 300A).

A separate petition filed by AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi echoed identical considerations. His plea described the amendments as clearly unconstitutional and talked about they were discriminatory, arbitrary, and infringed on assorted predominant rights corresponding to Articles 14, 15, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30, and 300A.

Folks and organizations enjoy additionally joined the good fight in opposition to the Act. These encompass AAP chief Amanatullah Khan, Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind’s Maulana Arshad Madani, the All India Muslim Inside of most Law Board, the Affiliation for Protection of Civil Rights, SDPI, the Indian Union Muslim League, and citizens treasure Taiyyab Khan Salmani and Anjum Kadari.

In the period in-between, six states dominated by the BJP—Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Assam—enjoy submitted their very own petitions. These states argue that scrapping or altering the Act may consequence in major correct and administrative issues.

Defending the rules, the central executive has talked about it targets to uplift economically weaker sections of the Muslim neighborhood. Union Minister for Minority Affairs, Kiren Rijiju, clarified that the law does now not touch or intervene with unusual Waqf properties. He emphasized that the executive’s motive is inclusive boom and pattern for all, in step with the precept of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas.”

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow