Former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar sentenced to life in 1984 anti-Sikh riots case

A Delhi Court on Tuesday awarded existence sentence to the accused Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in a case linked to killing the daddy-son duo in the Saraswati Vihar dwelling at some stage in the 1984 Anti Sikh riots. This comes after the prone Congress MP Sajjan Kumar used to be convicted on February 12 for killing of the daddy-son duo.
Special contemplate Kaveri Baweja sentenced Sajjan Kumar for the offence of wreck (302) learn with unlawful assembly (149) IPC.
He has also been sentenced to existence imprisonment for the offence of Destruction of property with fire (436) learn with Unlawful Meeting (149) IPC. He has been also sentenced for the assorted offences he used to be Convicted for.
The Rouse Avenue court on February 21 reserved hiss on sentence to be awarded to prone Congress MP Sajjan Kumar in 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots case.
Insurrection victims had sought capital punishment for Sajjan Kumar. Kumar is already serving a existence sentence following his 2018 conviction by the Delhi High Court in a separate case linked to the anti-Sikh riots.
The senior counsel H S Phoolka appeared on-line for the 1984 riots sufferer submitted his written submissions and sought capital punishment.
On February 17, the Prosecution on argued and sought the Loss of life penalty for Sajjan Kumar. Extra Public prosecutor (APP) Manish Rawat had filed written submissions. He pressed for the Loss of life penalty in peek of the pointers in Nirbhaya and more than a few circumstances.
APP Manish Rawat submitted that this case used to be a rarest of uncommon circumstances. On this case folks from a community had been focused with none provocation. It used to be also submitted that the incident, broke complete fibre of believe and cohesion among the many communities thereby severely affecting the knitting and assimilation of assorted non secular and social groups.
On January 31, the court had reserved the hiss after hearing extra submissions by the Public Prosecutor Manish Rawat.
This case is expounded to the killings of 1 Jaswant Singh and his son Tarundeep Singh in Saraswati vihar dwelling on November 1, 1984.
Point out Anil Sharma had submitted that Sajjan Kumar’s name used to be not there from the very origin, and that the rules of foreign land isn't acceptable in this case and there used to be a prolong of 16 years in naming Sajjan Kumar by the witness.
It used to be also submitted that a case whereby Sajjan Kumar used to be Convicted by the Delhi High Court is pending charm earlier than the Supreme court.
Point out Anil Sharma had also referred to the case cited by the senior advocate H S Phoolka. He submitted that the rules of the land will prevail even in the unprecedented reveal and not the worldwide rules.
Extra Public Prosecutor Manish Rawat in his rebuttal had submitted that the accused used to be not acknowledged to the sufferer. When she became awake that who is Sajjan Kumar she named him in her observation. Earlier, Senior advocate H S Phoolka had appeared for riots victims had argued that the police investigations had been manipulated in the Sikh riots circumstances. Police investigation used to be tardy and to place the accused.
It used to be argued that one and at some stage in riots reveal used to be unprecedented. Therefore, these circumstances procure to be dealt with in this context.
Precise through the arguments senior advocate H S Phoolka had referred to judgement of Delhi High Court and submitted that It isn't an isolated case, it used to be a a part of larger massacre, it is a a part of genocide. It used to be extra argued that as per official figures 2700 Sikhs had been killed in Delhi in 1984. It used to be an everyday reveal.
Senior Point out Phoolka had referred to the Delhi High Court judgement in 1984 Delhi cantt case whereby the court called the riots Crime in opposition to humanity. It used to be also acknowledged that aim of genocide is regularly targetting of minorities. There could be a prolong. Supreme court took it severely that there is prolong and a SIT used to be constituted, he argued.
The senior advocate had also referred to the judgement delivered by foreign courts in the circumstances of genocide and crime in opposition to humanity. He also referred to Geneva Convention.
It used to be also submitted that a charge sheet used to be willing in opposition to Sajjan Kumar in 1992 but used to be not filed in the court. It reveals that the police had been attempting to place Sajjan Kumar. On November 1, 2023, the court had recorded the observation of Sajjan Kumar. He had denied the total costs levelled in opposition to him. Initially an FIR used to be registered in Punjabi Bagh police place of dwelling. Later on, this case used to be investigated by the Special Investigation Crew constituted on the suggestion of justice G P Mathur committee and filed a charge sheet.
The committee had instructed the reopening of 114 circumstances. This case used to be one of them. On December 16, 2021, the court had framed costs in opposition to the accused Sajjan Kumar for charge of the offences punishable Under Piece 147/148/149 IPC moreover because the offences punishable Under part 302/308/ 323/395/397/427/436/440 learn with Piece 149 IPC.
It has been alleged by the SIT that the accused used to be leading the acknowledged mob and upon his instigation and abetment, the mob had burnt alive the above two americans and had also damaged, destroyed and looted their family articles and more than a few property, burnt their dwelling and likewise inflicted severe injuries on the person of their members of the family and members of the family residing in their dwelling.
It's alleged that one and at some stage at some point soon of investigation, topic cloth witnesses of the case had been traced out, examined and their statements had been recorded below part 161 Cr.P.C.
The statements of complainant below the above provision used to be recorded on 23.11.2016 at some stage at some point soon of this extra investigation, whereby she again narrated the above incident of looting, arson and murders of her husband and son by the mob armed with lethal weapons and she also would possibly be claimed to procure deposed therein about the injuries suffered by her and the assorted victims of the case, alongside with her sister in rules who is acknowledged to procure subsequently expired.
She had also clarified, interalia, in that observation that the photograph of accused used to be viewed by her in a magazine after round one and half of months.

(With Inputs From ANI)