Waqf case: SC asks Centre whether it is willing to allow Muslims to be part of Hindu religious trusts, Centre says…
Waqf case: The Centre recently notified the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which got the assent of President Droupadi Murmu on April 5 after its passage from Parliament following heated debates in both houses.
The Supreme Court docket on Wednesday started hearing on a batch of petitions tough the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Modification) Act, 2025. A bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Sanjay Kumar and Okay V Viswanathan outlined two aspects. The SC also asked Centre whether it is interesting to allow Muslims to be a part of Hindu non secular trusts.
“There are two aspects we want to inquire of every the perimeters to handle. In the beginning, whether we should always entertain or relegate it to the high court docket? Secondly, demonstrate in quick what you are literally urging and attempting to argue?” the CJI stated.
“The 2d point may wait on us in deciding the first issue to a diploma,” the CJI added. The hearing is underway with senior recommend Kapil Sibal, showing for the petitioners’ side, making submissions.
Solicitor frequent Tushar Mehta stated, “JPC had 38 sittings, examined 98.2 lakh memorandums earlier than Parliament’s each homes handed it. There used to be constitution of joint parliamentary committee and account for exercise used to be undertaken, says Centre.
The Centre no longer too long ago notified the Waqf (Modification) Act, 2025, which bought the assent of President Droupadi Murmu on April 5 after its passage from Parliament following heated debates in each homes.
The bill used to be handed within the Rajya Sabha with 128 contributors balloting in favour and 95 opposing it. It used to be cleared by the Lok Sabha with 288 contributors supporting it and 232 against it.
As many as 72 petitions, including those by AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, All India Muslim Private Legislation Board (AIMPLB), Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), Congress MPs Imran Pratapgarhi and Mohammad Jawed, possess been filed tough the validity of the Act.
The Centre, on April 8, filed a caveat within the apex court docket and sought a hearing earlier than any reveal used to be handed within the topic.
A caveat is filed by a celebration within the high courts and the apex court docket to make certain no orders are handed with out hearing it.
What's Your Reaction?
